SUMMARY
The latest version of Darktable includes AI features for denoising and masking, a move that deviates from its previous avoidance of the technology. However, Darktable's developers have adopted a policy that AI integration must support image improvement without altering semantic content, focusing on corrective and rote tasks. This is presented as a more responsible approach compared to extreme AI uses seen elsewhere, such as generative object removal or unrealistic sky replacements. The article draws a parallel between the current debate on AI and the historical use of DDT, suggesting that while individual responsible use might seem harmless, the cumulative impact of an emerging, potentially destructive technology warrants careful consideration and rejection where possible.
TAKEAWAYS
Darktable now uses AI for denoising and masking, with a policy focused on corrective image improvement.
The article critiques the broader implications of AI in photography, including energy consumption and artistic impact.
A comparison is made to DDT, highlighting the potential for unforeseen negative consequences of emerging technologies.
The author advocates for rejecting AI where feasible, given its nascent and potentially unsustainable nature.