SUMMARY
A side-by-side test using the Neewer Q6, a 600-watt flash with a 30-watt continuous light, compares flash and continuous lighting for portraits. The setup maintained identical modifiers and positions, with the camera and lighting placement precisely measured. While continuous light offers immediate visual feedback, reducing guesswork, flash provides greater output in a smaller package and allows for faster shutter speeds. The choice between them depends on studio constraints, heat tolerance, and the value placed on previewing the light before capture.
TAKEAWAYS
Both flash and continuous light can create nearly identical portraits.
Continuous light offers real-time preview, aiding workflow and client decisions.
Flash provides higher output and faster shutter speeds but requires more space and generates heat.
The decision between flash and continuous light depends on studio size, heat tolerance, and desired preview capabilities.