SUMMARY
While video capabilities are advancing rapidly on cameras, some photographers remain uninterested and question why photo-only models aren't more prevalent or cheaper. The article explains that manufacturers generally develop distinct camera models for specific target audiences rather than creating stripped-down versions of existing hybrids. For example, a camera like Nikon's ZR, designed for cinema/vlogging, intentionally omits features that might appeal to a Z6III buyer. Conversely, a stills-only Z6III would likely compete with the existing hybrid, leading to artificially restricted features rather than cost savings.
TAKEAWAYS
Photographers' frustration with increasing video features on cameras is noted.
The belief that photo-only cameras would be cheaper is generally unfounded.
Manufacturers create separate models for distinct audiences, not to cut costs.
A stills-only version of a hybrid camera would likely compete with the original, not be cheaper.