Generative AI vs. Photography

Summary

A freelance creator expresses strong opposition to Generative AI, particularly when used by individuals to mimic professional skills without genuine effort. While acknowledging AI's utility in tools like Lightroom masks, the author criticizes the entitlement fostered by Generative AI's capabilities. The piece draws a parallel between AI 'artists' and those who claim professional writing status via AI, asserting that true expertise in photography, like writing, requires years of practice and dedication. The author concludes that using AI to bypass skill acquisition is akin to theft, advocating for learning or hiring professionals instead.

Key points

• Generative AI is criticized for enabling users to bypass skill development in photography.
• The author argues that using AI to mimic professional work without effort is unethical and akin to theft.
• True expertise in photography requires years of practice and dedication, not AI prompts.
• Alternatives to AI for those unable to create images include hiring photographers or licensing stock photos.